THE RISK : what is lost forever

Linda Carlisle • August 5, 2024

“Good News! No one is being laid off”

Hearing this when your company is acquired can be the best six words you ever hear as an employee. But what happens when things change? Once leadership has time to truly evaluate and this statement is no longer true?

Transparency can be a double-edged sword

Transparency is an important ingredient for building #trust and creating a high-performing company culture that attracts top talent. Sharing information about company performance helps people feel valued and enables them to understand the reasoning behind decisions being made by leadership.


Stepping up to communicate life-changing news to your employees like a pending layoff can be as difficult as making the decision in the first place, especially if you are a caring leader of a company with a good culture. Knowing you are going to lay off good people is a difficult burden to carry, and your instinct may be to rip the band aid off and come clean about what you expect may be coming – even before you have all the facts at your disposal. But in the face of shocking news, people want certainty, so they know how to proceed. If you do not have all the answers, this may be one of those times where too deep a commitment to transparency can work against you and destroy morale.


When transparency backfires, trust may be lost forever.

A while back, I was brought in to help a local manufacturer that had recently acquired a smaller business that made and imported complimentary products to their original product lines. During our intake discussions, I learned that staff across both organizations were exhausted from the demands of keeping production on track while integrating two sets of business platforms and processes, coupled with the stress and uncertainty of working with new leaders and team members, no longer knowing who to go to for answers to their business process questions, and not having clarity and security in their new roles.


From a messaging standpoint, the newly combined leadership team had initially assured people at the acquired company that everyone was needed from both organizations, and that there was no need for anyone to be concerned about their jobs…each company manufactured something distinctly different, and there was very little production redundancy resulting from the acquisition. Unfortunately, despite this intention, several months after the companies began integrating, and well before the process was complete, the private equity investors and board of directors began asking tough questions about cost containment – and before the leaders knew it, they were being asked to conduct a workforce reduction.


Surprised by the board and investors’ expectations, the leadership team was misaligned around how best to communicate this turn of events. One of the leaders, in the spirit of “full transparency” – announced that there were to be layoffs early the next year. Knowing where they were in the integration process, IT and operations leaders and their human resource partners knew they would not be able to share meaningful information about the size of the workforce reduction for several months until a significant percentage of the systems integration work could be completed. The resulting 5-month silence left the full 3,800 person staff from both companies living with heightened uncertainty on top of their overwork and growing burnout from the changes they participated in, each convinced that the cuts would be deep and that they would be among the casualties. Morale sank so low that leaders had to offer retention bonuses to key staff to ensure that those needed to complete the transition would not leave prematurely and harm the integration timeline.


The people from both organizations felt betrayed because their leaders had assured them that the acquisition had been about extending the breadth of the product line and adding new product categories, not gaining personnel efficiency. Workers who had been asked to come together as newly formed teams looked at each other with suspicion, wondering which of them would survive the impending layoffs. And although the initial communication about layoffs was made in the name of transparency, the lack of timely follow-up further eroded trust. The employees were convinced that leadership simply did not care about the discomfort they were experiencing with a proverbial axe hanging over their heads.


What disengagement drivers were in play in this troubling scenario?

I began working with company leaders shortly after the layoff took place. Anecdotal feedback I received from speaking with the more vocal of the remaining staff was validated by the dismal feedback received through an initial engagement survey (which received an exceptionally low response rates – a classic byproduct of low trust and disengagement).


Remaining employees from both companies at all levels indicated experiencing:


  • A Lack of Trust, and Transparent Communications: The employees were unable to overcome their mistrust in messaging from senior leadership who had started their acquisition with promises of no workforce reductions.


  • Low Faith in Future Career Growth Opportunities: While some people did received advancements because of the workforce reduction, they felt that they had profited on the backs of their friends and colleagues; people no longer had faith that the company was flourishing and would be able to offer them a promising career.


  • Chronic Overwork and Burnout; Lack of Recognition and Support: The staff already felt burned out from the prolonged effort to keep manufacturing production levels steady without a hitch while undergoing new systems and business process integrations. Now they would be carrying the company’s production load forward with fewer colleagues.


  • Lack of Autonomy and Empowerment: Having life altering changes thrust upon them without their having any say undermined the sense of autonomy, empowerment, and control at all levels.


  • Poor or Uninspiring Organizational Culture: The company culture – already unclear and destabilized because two companies were in the process of merging together – seemed fractured and to many, beyond redemption.

 

Stepping in to assist leaders in the aftermath of the layoffs, I helped them develop a communications plan to regain the lost faith in leadership and reestablish a positive high-performance culture for the now-integrated organization. It took a year to develop and execute a plan to regain trust, enthusiasm, and psychological safety -- and to get people working better together as a strong, cohesive team that was meeting and exceeding performance targets.


There isn't a simple "undo" button in business, and the deep work this organization did to right the ship wasn't easy. While leadership had done what they thought was best by being transparent, they now realized that even transparency should be used strategically, with the goal always being to build and maintain their people’s trust. Because reengaging their people was important to the leadership team and they worked hard to align around a meaningful message strategy and commit to a cadence for communicating and connecting with their people going forward.


We all get it – sometimes we must make incredibly tough decisions to keep our businesses on track to even have a future. But it is also important to remember that your people are human beings – they have hopes and fears and career aspirations and insecurities – and families and mortgages and college tuition to pay for just like you. Sometimes when you lose the faith of your best people you never do get a chance to win it back. That is why it is so important to learn how to be thoughtful and caring with the degree of transparency you put into your communications.



I believe we all benefit in our business journeys by sharing stories of overcoming hard things.

What is something you can take back to your own organization to make strategic use of transparent communications in your business?


By Linda Carlisle • September 30, 2026
Why It May Be Time for a Better Metaphor for Organizational Transformation
By Linda Carlisle • September 30, 2026
In the Trust Economy, even a sound strategy can crash and burn when the tank runs dry.
By Linda Carlisle • August 31, 2026
This article in CHRO Daily explores Change Fatigue
By Linda Carlisle • August 21, 2026
When a company appears on a “Fastest-growing” list, most people see success. I see a series of leadership moments quietly approaching. Don’t get me wrong -- rapid growth is wonderful. It means customers are buying. New people are joining your ranks. Opportunities are expanding. It means your organization is doing something right. But accelerated growth changes far more than the size of the organization.  Everything from your leadership practices and communication habits to the cultural norms that helped a company succeed at 50 or 100 employees doesn’t necessarily work when you need to reach 300, 500, or 1,000 people. Yet companies often invest heavily in preparing the business for its next stage of growth – bringing in new systems, facilities, technology, financing… and even talent, while investing far less in preparing for how they will help their people navigate the changes that growth brings with them. And that's where success can unexpectedly create risk. When I think about the companies that do this right, I think of the giant redwoods. Redwoods can grow more than 90 meters tall, yet their root systems are surprisingly shallow. Rather than growing deep, their roots spread widely and intertwine with those of neighboring trees, helping these enormous trees support one another. And beneath the forest floor, those roots connect with networks of mycorrhizal fungi that enable the exchange of nutrients and information across the forest. Growing organizations need their own version of that interconnected system. As companies become larger and more complex, they need strong, adaptive communication systems and cultures that allow information to travel, people to remain connected, and the organization to respond collectively to change. The taller the organization grows, the more intentional those connections need to become. The Founder Can't Know Everyone Anymore In smaller organizations with 2 to 50 or 100 people, communication often happens through relationships built by proximity and ‘management by walking around’ (MWA). You’ve undoubtedly seen it. The founder walks through the building, stopping to greet individual employees by name. People hear what’s happening because they sit near someone who has the inside scoop. New employees learn about the culture by observing the people on their team. In the startup and early growth stages, there may not be much of a formal communication infrastructure in the business, because the company doesn’t need one. Then the company grows. Suddenly, the founder can’t talk to everyone. In addition to the greater demands that face the leader of a high-growth company, there may also be multiple locations, functions or shifts. New employees may never even meet the people who established the company’s earliest traditions. Decisions move through several layers of leadership before reaching the people expected to execute them. Consider a 75-person manufacturer that grows to 300 employees and opens a second facility. Employees at the original plant still hear news directly from leaders they know, while employees at the new location depend on supervisors and word of mouth. Without intending to, the company has created two very different communication experiences. The organization has crossed an important threshold: It can no longer rely primarily on relationships to keep people connected. It needs systems. Establishing and implementing communication systems and protocols, and documenting cultural norms, doesn’t mean replacing human connection with corporate bureaucracy. It simply means intentionally creating communication channels, leadership practices, and cultural mechanisms that allow information to keep flowing, transparency and inclusion to continue, and critical connections to survive as the organization becomes more complex. The Middle Management Gap Growth also creates another challenge: more managers -- many of whom are promoted because they were exceptional individual contributors. They know the business, understand the customers – and they get results. But suddenly, their job isn't simply to perform the work. As managers, they’re expected to explain strategy and translate leadership decisions into meaningful guidance for their functional team. Whereas they were once accountable for doing their own work exceptionally well, they are now expected to coach other employees and help them succeed – both professionally and inter-personally. They are now responsible for helping their teams navigate uncertainty, interpret cultural norms, and handle difficult conversations. In other words, they become one of the organization’s most important communication channels. Yet few companies intentionally prepare them for that role…and this is where communication often begins to fracture. Managers are also expected to answer questions they may never have anticipated being asked -- sometimes questions leadership hasn’t fully answered for them. Without talking points, FAQs, or a clear feedback loop for unanswered questions, managers are left to punt, avoid the question, or offer their “best guess.” That’s how inconsistent messages -- and rumors -- begin. Imagine a company where the CEO has just announced a new growth strategy at the town hall and assume managers will carry the message forward to their teams. Despite there being no detailed talking points, FAQ documents, or other tools to explain how the strategy will impact each individual business function, one manager soldiers through to explain what it means for the team; another forwards the slides the CEO used in the town hall; a third admits, “I’m not really sure what this means for us.” One announcement has suddenly become three different employee experiences. Senior leaders believe they’ve communicated something because they announced it. Managers interpret it differently. Employees hear different versions depending on which manager they report to. And a message that seemed perfectly clear in the executive meeting becomes increasingly distorted as it travels through the organization. In the absence of communications infrastructure (email, newsletter, intranet, Slack/Teams, regular town halls, etc.), growth makes effective manager communication capability a business requirement. Manager cascade is essential -- but consistently excellent manager cascade is also notoriously difficult to achieve without dedicated support focused on developing communications tools that enable managers to be effective and stay aligned as they announce strategic initiatives. Culture Stops Happening Naturally Culture changes as organizations scale. At 50 employees, culture spreads largely through proximity. People watch how the founder behaves. They learn which behaviors get rewarded. Stories travel quickly. Informal norms are reinforced every day. But at 400 employees, culture can’t depend on proximity. It must spread deliberately, by design. Leaders must become much more deliberate about defining the behaviors that matter to the company’s future success and describing what those behaviors look like in practice. Then they must reinforce them through managers, employee experience, communications, leadership modeling, and recognition. Otherwise, something else happens: Every department, location, or leader begins creating its own version of the culture. That’s how organizations wake up one day and realize the company they built no longer feels like the company they remember. Imagine a company that has doubled its workforce in 18 months, and added a 2nd shift. Half the employees learned “how we do things here” by working alongside the founders and early leaders; the other half joined after that proximity disappeared. Unless the culture has been made explicit, those two groups may be working from very different definitions of what the company values. Culture didn’t disappear. It drifted and decentralized. That’s why I often talk about building Culture by Design...Not by Default. Growth doesn’t make culture less important, but it does make leaving culture to chance much riskier. Today's Growth Often Creates Tomorrow's Moment That Matters™ Fast-growing companies also frequently sustain their momentum through other major transitions. • Private equity investment. • An acquisition. • International expansion. • A new facility. • Founder retirement. • Second-generation leadership. • An outside CEO. • A significant technology implementation. None of these transitions indicate that something has gone wrong…Quite the opposite. In fact, they often occur precisely because the company has been successful. But each one introduces another layer of organizational complexity -- and another test of whether the company’s leadership, communication, and culture infrastructure have grown alongside the business. The best time to focus on building these capabilities isn’t after the next major transition has already begun. It's before you need them. Consider a company receiving a significant capital infusion to acquire a competitor, build a new facility or dramatically expand production. The financial investment may solve the capacity problem, but it doesn't automatically create leadership alignment, strong communications discipline and practices, manager readiness, employee engagement or a unified culture. Those capabilities have to be built, too. And sophisticated growth planning should anticipate those needs before the capital is deployed…not discover them after execution begins. When Communication Becomes a Strategic Capability Eventually, growing organizations reach a point where communication can no longer be something “the leaders do” by walking around and chatting with people, or having more an more meetings. As organizations grow, “we all communicate” is no longer a communications strategy. The organization needs a disciplined approach for understanding what people need to know, which initiatives require coordinated communication, who needs to hear what and when, and which channels and messengers are best suited to the audience and the moment. • Leadership alignment before major announcements. • Manager toolkits that help supervisors translate strategy for their teams. • Internal communication channels that reliably reach employees across locations and functions. • Listening mechanisms that help leaders understand what employees are experiencing. • More intentional onboarding. • A stronger employer brand. • Greater executive visibility. • Clearer connections between business strategy and employees’ everyday work. These communications capabilities are not critical because communication suddenly becomes important. They become more essential as the organization becomes more complex. Because complexity creates distance. Distance between leaders and employees. Between strategy and execution. Between the culture leadership believes exists and the culture employees experience. A company can open its new facility on schedule and still struggle operationally if employees don’t understand why the company is expanding, what the change means for them, how the two locations will work together, or which cultural norms must remain consistent. The building may be ready for business before the organization is ready to operate as one company. And strategic organizational communication capabilities close these gaps in understanding. Growth Itself Is a Moment That Matters™ We tend to think about organizational communication challenges when something dramatic happens -- a merger, restructuring, new technology or strategy, a CEO transition, or another major transformation. And yes, any organization that undergoes these major milestones without addressing gaps in its professional communication capabilities is likely to struggle. But even with that said, some of the most consequential Moments that Matter™ arrive much more quietly, and they can outgrow your organization’s existing communication capabilities and cultural infrastructure without anyone immediately recognizing what’s happening. Consider the following everyday occurrences that quietly break the company’s ability to communicate effectively: • The company adds another 100 employees. • A second location opens. • The founder can’t attend every meeting anymore. • Another layer of management appears. • People who once knew one another personally now recognize only a fraction of their colleagues. In each of these situations, nothing is wrong. In fact, the company is winning. But success itself has fundamentally changed the organization. Fast growth deserves to be celebrated. But leaders shouldn’t wait until the next major transition to strengthen the culture and communication systems that will help their organizations scale. Because companies rarely stumble simply because demand exceeded capacity and the company needed to grow. They stumble when their leadership practices, communication systems, and culture don't evolve as quickly as the business does. If leadership says, “Give us the capital and resources we need, and we’ll grow” -- and someone provides them -- leadership then has an obligation to ensure the organization can convert those resources into performance. When a business struggles after receiving the capital, equipment, technology or acquisition it said it needed to reach the next level, stakeholders are justified in asking whether leadership adequately prepared the organization to capitalize on that investment. If the resources are there but the organization still can’t execute because people aren’t aligned, managers aren’t prepared, cultures aren’t integrating, or employees aren’t engaged, the problem may no longer be resources. It may be organizational readiness. And for a PE investor, board, or other stakeholder, that’s when a communication and culture problem can begin to look like a leadership problem. So yes, prepare the business for growth. Invest in the facility, technology, acquisition, and talent that will take the company to the next level. But invest in the communication and culture infrastructure that will help your people take it there, too. Like the redwoods, extraordinary growth requires an equally strong system of connection and support. The time to build that infrastructure isn't after growth exposes the gaps. It's before. Is your firm growing faster than its communication & culture infrastructure? If growth, expansion, acquisition or another major transition is on your horizon, I’d be happy to compare notes on what your organization may need before the gaps begin to show.
By Linda Carlisle • August 20, 2026
I am SO pleased to be a part of this new Podcast Episode of FUTURE VENTURES - CLARITY AT SCALE During this episode, host Maxim and I discuss 5 Key Topics: ** Communication as organizational infrastructure ** Culture by design, not default ** Turning strategy into a story people can enter ** Communicating through Moments that Matter™ ** Listening, authenticity, and trust ...arriving at three key insights: 1) As companies grow, communication should not depend on the founder being everywhere. What worked in the beginning needs to become a simple, repeatable system that keeps things clear and avoids mixed messages. 2) Culture is expressed through repeated behaviors, not just statements on a wall. Scaling leaders need to decide which behaviors they want to keep, which need to change, and how those expectations shape everyday decisions. 3) Employees are more likely to accept change when they can see themselves in that future. Founders still need to set the direction, but clear communication helps connect that vision to people’s work, growth, and sense of belonging. Hope you enjoy listening as much as I enjoyed guesting! _________________________________________________________ FUTURE VENTURES is the podcast for founders, operators, and investors who are building companies worth owning for the long term -- and who need to think clearly about capital, structure, strategy, and growth to get there. Each episode cuts through the noise around scaling: how to structure a deal, how to position a business for institutional capital, how to build operational leverage without losing control, and how to make the high-stakes decisions that compound in value long after the moment has passed. Hosted by Maxim Atanassov, CPA-CA - a four-time founder and the Managing Partner of Future Ventures Corp. Since 2018, FVC has invested in, incubated, and scaled companies across sectors — with a focus on platform opportunities that compound in value. Maxim's background spans executive leadership inside Canada's largest energy companies and senior advisory at Deloitte and EY. He's a CPA-CA who has sat at the table where capital gets deployed, governance gets built, and hard decisions get made. Now he helps founders get there faster. https://lnkd.in/g8KStgxX
By Linda Carlisle • June 18, 2026
From charisma to credibility: navigating leadership transitions in an era of podcasts, social media, and heightened employee expectations.
By Linda Carlisle • June 10, 2026
Linda Carlisle guests with host John Pezoulas on the ReadySetExec podcast
By Linda Carlisle • May 18, 2026
Comm-ext Launches Communications Toolkit to Help Leaders Navigate Layoffs Without Damaging Trust, Culture or Performance 
Earth Day Reflection text over a sunny park scene with a parked car, trees, and a person near a tree
By Linda Carlisle • April 28, 2026
Understand the shift from childhood environmental awareness to today's climate crisis. Join us in driving impactful change.
Abstract seashell with pearl on sandy background, overlaid with quote: “Great communicators layer messages with care.”
By Linda Carlisle • April 9, 2026
Integrate strategy & culture into daily messages for a stronger employee experience. Contact us for tailored communications solutions.
Show More